Zimmerman v. Wallman
244 A.2d 371, 156 Conn. 637
Opinion
On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably find that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable com[638]*638pensation for the injuries the named plaintiff sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc., 154 Conn. 61, 68, 221 A.2d 263; Lopez v. Price, 145 Conn. 560, 564, 569, 145 A.2d 127.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zimmerman v. Wallman, 244 A.2d 371, 156 Conn. 637 (Colo. 1968).
244 A.2d 371 (Zimmerman v. Wallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parent v. St. Pierre
287 A.2d 743 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1971)