Zimmerman v. Wallman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Zimmerman v. Wallman

244 A.2d 371, 156 Conn. 637

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 6, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.2d 371 (Zimmerman v. Wallman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Wallman, 244 A.2d 371, 156 Conn. 637 (Colo. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably find that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable com[638]*638pensation for the injuries the named plaintiff sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc., 154 Conn. 61, 68, 221 A.2d 263; Lopez v. Price, 145 Conn. 560, 564, 569, 145 A.2d 127.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably find that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable com[638]*638pensation for the injuries the named plaintiff sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc., 154 Conn. 61, 68, 221 A.2d 263; Lopez v. Price, 145 Conn. 560, 564, 569, 145 A.2d 127.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.2d 371, 156 Conn. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-wallman-conn-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack