Parent v. St. Pierre

287 A.2d 743, 161 Conn. 565
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 1, 1971
StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.2d 743 (Parent v. St. Pierre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parent v. St. Pierre, 287 A.2d 743, 161 Conn. 565 (Colo. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably have found that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiff Rowena Parent sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Zimmerman v. Wallman, 156 Conn. 637, 244 A.2d 371.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zimmerman v. Wallman
244 A.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 A.2d 743, 161 Conn. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parent-v-st-pierre-conn-1971.