Parent v. St. Pierre

287 A.2d 743, 161 Conn. 565
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 1, 1971·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably have found that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiff Rowena Parent sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. Zimmerman v. Wallman, 156 Conn. 637, 244 A.2d 371.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parent v. St. Pierre, 287 A.2d 743, 161 Conn. 565 (Colo. 1971).

287 A.2d 743 (Parent v. St. Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zimmerman v. Wallman
244 A.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1968)