Zimmerman v. Morris Plan Bank
150 N.E. 920, 113 Ohio St. 703, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 703, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 236
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause, and the alleged constitutional question was not presented to or passed upon by the Court of Appeals.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zimmerman v. Morris Plan Bank, 150 N.E. 920, 113 Ohio St. 703, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 703, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 236 (Ohio 1925).
150 N.E. 920 (Zimmerman v. Morris Plan Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moats v. Metropolitan Bank of Lima
319 N.E.2d 603 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. Phillips
272 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Lynn
214 N.E.2d 226 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)
State ex rel. King v. Shannon
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 393 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1960)