Zimmerman v. Chrisman

7 Hill & Den. 153
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1844·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

In actions for defamation, some special reason, beyond a good cause of action, must be shown for holding the defendant to bail; for example, that he is a transient person, residing out of the jurisdiction of the court. (Clason v. Gould, 2 Caines, 47; Van Vechten v. Hopkins, 2 John. 293; Norton v. Barnum, 20 id. 337.) The rule appears [154] to be the same in actions for assault and battery. (Bagley's Cham. Prac. 74, 75.) In this case no sufficient reason was stated in the affidavit on which the judge’s order was made.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zimmerman v. Chrisman, 7 Hill & Den. 153 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

7 Hill & Den. 153 (Zimmerman v. Chrisman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clason v. Gould
2 Cai. Cas. 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1804)
Van Vechten v. Hopkins
2 Johns. 293 (New York Supreme Court, 1807)