Clason v. Gould

2 Cai. Cas. 47
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The defendant must be discharged. The affidavit does not show a cause of action sufficient to hold to bail. In a suit for defamation, whether the defamation be by words or writing, the plaintiff is not entitled to hold Jo bail, except in slander of title, unless some special cause be shown. No special cause is disclosed in the present case. To allow *bail here, would be to allow it in every case of defamation. There is no rule or guide given for the discretion of the judge or court, and that discretion, upon such an affidavit as the present, must necessarily be arbitrary, which the law will not allow.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clason v. Gould, 2 Cai. Cas. 47 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 47 (Clason v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gelles v. Rosenbaum
141 Misc. 588 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Temple
2 Sweeny 344 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1870)
Benson v. Bennett
25 N.J.L. 166 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1855)
Zimmerman v. Chrisman
7 Hill & Den. 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Satterlee v. Lynch
6 Hill & Den. 228 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)