Zielinski v. Van Pelt

9 A.D.3d 874, 779 N.Y.S.2d 392
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 9, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.3d 874 (Zielinski v. Van Pelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zielinski v. Van Pelt, 9 A.D.3d 874, 779 N.Y.S.2d 392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered November 4, 2002. The order denied the motion of defendants Stephanie A. Smith and Donald L. Smith and the cross motion of defendant Robert C. Van Pelt to bifurcate the trial.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as Zielinski v Van Pelt (9 AD3d 874 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zielinski v. Van Pelt
9 A.D.3d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.3d 874, 779 N.Y.S.2d 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zielinski-v-van-pelt-nyappdiv-2004.