Ziadeh v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1154
AIDA L. ZIADEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00386-REP)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aida L. Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Aida L. Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion to compel compliance with a consent order and denying
her motion for a partial stay of the consent order pending
resolution of the motion to compel. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ziadeh v. United States, No.
3:06-cv-00386-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2008); see Dart Drug Corp. v.
Nicholakos, 277 S.E.2d 155, 158 (Va. 1981) (burden on movant to
show consent unreasonably withheld). To the extent that Ziadeh
challenges earlier court orders, they are not before this court.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ziadeh v. United States (Ziadeh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.