Ziadeh v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2008·No. 08-1154·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1154

AIDA L. ZIADEH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00386-REP)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aida L. Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Aida L. Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion to compel compliance with a consent order and denying

her motion for a partial stay of the consent order pending

resolution of the motion to compel. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Ziadeh v. United States, No.

3:06-cv-00386-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2008); see Dart Drug Corp. v.

Nicholakos, 277 S.E.2d 155, 158 (Va. 1981) (burden on movant to

show consent unreasonably withheld). To the extent that Ziadeh

challenges earlier court orders, they are not before this court.

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ziadeh v. United States, (4th Cir. 2008).

Ziadeh v. United States (Ziadeh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dart Drug Corp. v. Nicholakos
277 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1981)