Ziadeh v. United States

282 F. App'x 227
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2008·No. No. 08-1154·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Aida L. Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel compliance with a consent order and denying her motion for a partial stay of the consent order pending resolution of the motion to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ziadeh v. United States, No. 3:06-cv-00386-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2008); see Dart Drug Coup. v. Nicholakos, 221 Va. 989, 277 S.E.2d 155, 158 (1981) (burden on movant to show consent unreasonably withheld). To the extent that Ziadeh challenges earlier court orders, they are not before this court. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ziadeh v. United States, 282 F. App'x 227 (4th Cir. 2008).

282 F. App'x 227 (Ziadeh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dart Drug Corp. v. Nicholakos
277 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1981)