Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 2023
Docket1:20-cv-03951
StatusUnknown

This text of Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc. (Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

I, John Du Wors eCwm an Direct. +206.274.2834 Main +206.274.2800 + D We john@newmanlaw.com u Ors 2101 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1500 Seattle | Los Angeles | San Francisco Seattle, WA 98121

SENT BY ECF August 19, 2022 The Honorable Lorna G. Schofield U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc. Southern District of New York Case No.: 20 Civ. 3951 Dear Judge Schofield, We represent Plaintiff Zeta Global Corp. in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Practices, Zeta seeks an order permitting Zeta to file under seal copy of Plaintiff’s Second Supplemental Patent Disclosures of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions, dated August 19, 2022, as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jae Young Bang in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Have This Case Declared Exceptional and for Permission to Apply for Attorney's Fees. The exhibit contains excerpts from Maropost's source code that Maropost has designated as attorney's eyes only under the Court's protective order. Respectfully submitted If Maropost seeks to maintain Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jae Young P y Bang at Dkt. No. 150-1 under seal, Maropost shall file a letter stating NEWMAN Du Wors LLP the grounds for that request by January 6, 2023.

/s/ John Du Wors Maropost's letter should address the standard in Lugosch v. Pyramid John Du Wors Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006), which does not Counsel for Plaintiff depend on how the information was designated under the protective Zeta Global Corp order. The letter shall also address the extent to which any purportedly confidential business information has become stale, if at cc: Elizabeth J. Sher (by ECF) ll. If no letter is filed, the document may be made public. So Ordered. Dated: January 3, 2023 □ - if LY New York, New York Lorna G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zeta Global Corp. v. Maropost Marketing Cloud, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeta-global-corp-v-maropost-marketing-cloud-inc-nysd-2023.