Zenn v. Anzalone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zenn v. Anzalone

4 A.D.2d 945, 168 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3812

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.D.2d 945 (Zenn v. Anzalone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zenn v. Anzalone, 4 A.D.2d 945, 168 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendants-respondents. The only operative portion of the opinion, as implemented by the short form order of February 15, 1957, is the denial of the motion to punish appellants herein for contempt, and they of course do not appeal from that part of the order. Accordingly, the order, as submitted to us, is not appealable, and the appeal must be dismissed. We therefore do not reach a consideration of the merits or propriety of Special Term’s censure of counsel, nor of its statement as to the binding effect of the injunction order of June. 7, 1954. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Frank and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendants-respondents. The only operative portion of the opinion, as implemented by the short form order of February 15, 1957, is the denial of the motion to punish appellants herein for contempt, and they of course do not appeal from that part of the order. Accordingly, the order, as submitted to us, is not appealable, and the appeal must be dismissed. We therefore do not reach a consideration of the merits or propriety of Special Term’s censure of counsel, nor of its statement as to the binding effect of the injunction order of June. 7, 1954. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Frank and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 945, 168 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zenn-v-anzalone-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack