Zenn v. Anzalone
1 A.D.2d 662, 146 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. We construe the order of reference, in entitling appellant to raise any question as to the fairness, reasonableness or adequacy of the settlement, to include the issue and the effect, if any, of the exclusion of persons from the negotiations for settlement. We assume that unless there is an adverse effect on the settlement by reason of such exclusion, exclusion will not have been shown to be improper. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Bastow and Cox, JJ. [See post, p. 773.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zenn v. Anzalone, 1 A.D.2d 662, 146 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).
1 A.D.2d 662 (Zenn v. Anzalone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Bowman
244 F. Supp. 51 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Alleghany Corporation v. Allan P. Kirby, Charles T. Ireland, Jr., and Fred M. Kirby, Randolph Phillips
340 F.2d 311 (Second Circuit, 1965)