Zeleny v. Chris Bryant

E.D. Oklahoma

Zeleny v. Chris Bryant

DecidedSeptember 12, 2019

Docket6:19-cv-00206

StatusUnknown

This text of Zeleny v. Chris Bryant (Zeleny v. Chris Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zeleny v. Chris Bryant, (E.D. Okla. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AVERY NELSON ZELENY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. CIV 19-206-RAW-SPS ) CHRIS BRYANT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER In response to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 7), Plaintiff filed an amended civil rights complaint (Dkt. 8). The amended complaint dismissed Defendant Carter County Detention Center and added two new defendants: (1) the District Court of the 20th Judicial District of the State of Oklahoma sitting in and for Carter County, and (2) Kimberly Tressler, Oklahoma Indigent Defense Attorney-at-Law. Id. at 4. The Carter County District Court, however, must be dismissed, because it is not a “person” under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. . . . 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (emphasis added). See Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for the Deaf & Blind, 173 F.3d 1226, 1237 (10th Cir. 1999) (holding that “a cause of action under § 1983 requires a deprivation of a civil right by a ‘person’ acting under color of state law”). See also Harris v. Champion, 51 F.3d 901, 906 (10th Cir. 1995) (“[T]his and other circuit courts have held that a state court is not a ‘person’ under § 1983.”), superseded by statute on other grounds; Coopersmith v. Supreme Ct. of Colo., 465 F.2d 993, 994 (10th Cir. 1972) (State courts are not “persons” as contemplated in civil rights statutes.). ACCORDINGLY, Defendant District Court of the 20th Judicial District of the State of Oklahoma sitting in and for Carter County is DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of September 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA AVERY NELSON ZELENY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. CIV 19-206-RAW-SPS ) CHRIS BRYANT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER In response to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 7), Plaintiff filed an amended civil rights complaint (Dkt. 8). The amended complaint dismissed Defendant Carter County Detention Center and added two new defendants: (1) the District Court of the 20th Judicial District of the State of Oklahoma sitting in and for Carter County, and (2) Kimberly Tressler, Oklahoma Indigent Defense Attorney-at-Law. Id. at 4. The Carter County District Court, however, must be dismissed, because it is not a “person” under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. . . . 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (emphasis added). See Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for the Deaf & Blind, 173 F.3d 1226, 1237 (10th Cir. 1999) (holding that “a cause of action under § 1983 requires a deprivation of a civil right by a ‘person’ acting under color of state law”). See also Harris v. Champion, 51 F.3d 901, 906 (10th Cir. 1995) (“[T]his and other circuit courts have held that a state court is not a ‘person’ under § 1983.”), superseded by statute on other grounds; Coopersmith v. Supreme Ct. of Colo., 465 F.2d 993, 994 (10th Cir. 1972) (State courts are not “persons” as contemplated in civil rights statutes.). ACCORDINGLY, Defendant District Court of the 20th Judicial District of the State of Oklahoma sitting in and for Carter County is DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of September 2019.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Zeleny v. Chris Bryant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeleny-v-chris-bryant-oked-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack