Zeisler v. Dandridge Co.
187 A.D. 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1919·No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2; Appeal No. 3·Published
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion in Appeal No. 3 granted to the extent of amending the order so as to provide that, in case such amendment be had and costs paid, the judgment be opened. Present — Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ. Order to be settled on notice before Mr. Justice Blackmar.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zeisler v. Dandridge Co., 187 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
187 A.D. 903 (Zeisler v. Dandridge Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.