Zeisler v. Dandridge Co.
187 A.D. 899
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
This text of 187 A.D. 899 (Zeisler v. Dandridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zeisler v. Dandridge Co., 187 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Kings county upon the motion first made to amend the complaint affirmed, without costs, because of the insufficiency of the papers upon which it was made. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 A.D. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zeisler-v-dandridge-co-nyappdiv-1919.