Z.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 2022
Docket22-0024
StatusPublished

This text of Z.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (Z.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Z.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed November 10, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0024 Lower Tribunal No. 21-341 ________________

Z.B., A Juvenile, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando A. Prescott, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Nicholas Lynch, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Phantom of Clearwater, Inc. v. Pinellas County, 894 So. 2d

1011, 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“[T]he fact that an ordinance imposes

additional requirements on a person or business is not evidence of

conflict.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phantom of Clearwater v. Pinellas County
894 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Z.B., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zb-a-juvenile-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.