Zavala v. Ashcroft
This text of 84 F. App'x 833 (Zavala v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Bedolla Zavala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s decision finding him removable due to his guilty plea conviction on one count of possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11377(a). Our jurisdiction over Zavala’s petition for review is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), which states that “no court shall have jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), (B),(C), or (D).” Because Zavala was convicted of an offense covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), we lack jurisdiction over his petition for review. See Cruz-Aguilera v. INS, 245 F.Sd 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.2001) (indicating that a conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11377(a) for possession of methamphetamine qualifies as a controlled substance offense).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zavala-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.