Zarelli v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' Local No. 699

311 A.2d 206, 125 N.J. Super. 412, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3024, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 466
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided November 9, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is settled that an action by a union member against the union and its officers asserting wrongful in[413] terference with “existing or prospective employment relations”, is not cognizable in the state courts; that such matters have been pre-empted by the Federal government by virtue of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U. S. C. § 151 et seq.; Iron Workers Union v. Perko, 373 U. S. 701, 705, 83 S. Ct. 1429, 10 L. Ed. 2d 646 (1963); Association of Journeymen v. Borden, 373 U. S. 690, 83 S. Ct. 1423, 10 L. Ed. 2d 638 (1963); Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge, 403 U. S. 274, 295-297, 91 S. Ct. 1909, 29 L. Ed. 2d 473 (1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zarelli v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' Local No. 699, 311 A.2d 206, 125 N.J. Super. 412, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3024, 1973 N.J. Super. LEXIS 466 (N.J. Ct. App. 1973).

311 A.2d 206 (Zarelli v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' Local No. 699) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davenport v. Terry
338 A.2d 815 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)