Zane v. Friends Hospital

781 A.2d 93
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zane v. Friends Hospital. Read the opinion of the Court — 575 Pa. 236
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 13, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. ‘Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiality provision set forth in 50 P.S. § 7111?”
2. Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiali[94]*94ty provision set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5944?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zane v. Friends Hospital, 781 A.2d 93 (Pa. 2001).

781 A.2d 93 (Zane v. Friends Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 5944
Pennsylvania § 5944