Zane v. Friends Hospital
781 A.2d 93
This text of 781 A.2d 93 (Zane v. Friends Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zane v. Friends Hospital, 781 A.2d 93 (Pa. 2001).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1. ‘Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiality provision set forth in 50 P.S. § 7111?”
2. Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiali[94]*94ty provision set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5944?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 5944
Pennsylvania § 5944
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
781 A.2d 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zane-v-friends-hospital-pa-2001.