Zane v. Friends Hospital

781 A.2d 93, 566 Pa. 322, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1941
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 13, 2001·No. No. 109 EAL 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. “Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiality provision set forth in 50 P.S. § 7111?”
2. ‘Was the Superior Court’s remand improper since, under the coordinate jurisdiction rule, Judge Quinones [323]*323Alejandro could not legally follow Judge Sheppard’s prior order compelling Friends Hospital to produce Ronald Anderson’s hospital records for an in camera inspection since production violates the confidentiality provision set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5944?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zane v. Friends Hospital, 781 A.2d 93, 566 Pa. 322, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1941 (Pa. 2001).

781 A.2d 93 (Zane v. Friends Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. Home Depot
832 A.2d 487 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Van Zandt v. Holy Redeemer Hospital
806 A.2d 879 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)