Zaccagnino v. Sisca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zaccagnino v. Sisca

223 A.D.2d 546, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 223 A.D.2d 546 (Zaccagnino v. Sisca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zaccagnino v. Sisca, 223 A.D.2d 546, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant [547]*547to Family Court act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dated September 22, 1994, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mrsich, H.E.), entered July 8, 1994, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contentions, he failed to meet his burden by establishing a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a downward modification of child support (see, Family Ct Act § 461 [b] [ii]; Matter of Staffanell v Staffanell, 220 AD2d 751). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant [547]*547to Family Court act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dated September 22, 1994, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mrsich, H.E.), entered July 8, 1994, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contentions, he failed to meet his burden by establishing a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant a downward modification of child support (see, Family Ct Act § 461 [b] [ii]; Matter of Staffanell v Staffanell, 220 AD2d 751). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 546, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaccagnino-v-sisca-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack