Moussa v. Cobbs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moussa v. Cobbs

37 A.D.3d 471, 827 N.Y.S.2d 884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.3d 471 (Moussa v. Cobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moussa v. Cobbs, 37 A.D.3d 471, 827 N.Y.S.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J), dated February 3, 2006, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Grier, S.M.), dated June 30, 2005, dismissing, after a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[472]*472The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate dismissing his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation (see Family Court Act § 461 [b] [ii]; Matter of Zaccagnino v Sisca, 223 AD2d 546 [1996]; cf. Matter of Ketcham v Crawford, 1 AD3d 359 [2003]). Miller, J.P., Florio, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J), dated February 3, 2006, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Grier, S.M.), dated June 30, 2005, dismissing, after a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[472]*472The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate dismissing his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation (see Family Court Act § 461 [b] [ii]; Matter of Zaccagnino v Sisca, 223 AD2d 546 [1996]; cf. Matter of Ketcham v Crawford, 1 AD3d 359 [2003]). Miller, J.P., Florio, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.3d 471, 827 N.Y.S.2d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moussa-v-cobbs-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack