Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp.
This text of 756 So. 2d 124 (Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the entry of summary final judgment because there are genuine issues of fact concerning the existence of a default in payment and whether interest due under the note was properly calculated. See Fatherly v. California Fed. Bank, FSB, 703 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 668 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); and Bakst v. F.D.I.C., 617 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
[125]*125The remaining issues raised by the appellant are without merit.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
756 So. 2d 124, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1392, 2000 WL 173453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zabler-v-resolution-trust-corp-fladistctapp-2000.