Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp.

756 So. 2d 124, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1392, 2000 WL 173453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
DocketNo. 4D99-0064
StatusPublished

This text of 756 So. 2d 124 (Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp., 756 So. 2d 124, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1392, 2000 WL 173453 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the entry of summary final judgment because there are genuine issues of fact concerning the existence of a default in payment and whether interest due under the note was properly calculated. See Fatherly v. California Fed. Bank, FSB, 703 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 668 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); and Bakst v. F.D.I.C., 617 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

[125]*125The remaining issues raised by the appellant are without merit.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

STONE, HAZOURI, JJ., and STETTIN, HERBERT, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fatherly v. California Federal Bank, FSB
703 So. 2d 1101 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Bakst v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
617 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co.
668 So. 2d 330 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 So. 2d 124, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1392, 2000 WL 173453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zabler-v-resolution-trust-corp-fladistctapp-2000.