Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 668 So. 2d 330 (Pearlstein v. Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants, Kenneth Pearlstein and Marilyn Pearlstein, appeal from a summary judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of appel-lee, Pennsylvania National Bank and Trust Company, and from an order denying their motion for rehearing. We treat appellants’ appeal as a nonfinal appeal in light of their unresolved pending counterclaim. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv).
We reverse the summary judgment of foreclosure finding that there are unresolved issues of material fact on the affirmative defense of payment of the debt. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368 (Fla.1979); Fine Arts Museums Found. v. First Nat'l in Palm Beach, a Div. of First Union Nat’l Bank of Fla., 633 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 641 So.2d 1346 (Fla.1994). Further, the record reflects that appellee’s affidavits have not sufficiently rebutted the appellants’ affirmative defense of payment. See Haven Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Kirian, 579 So.2d 730 (Fla.1991).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 So. 2d 330, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1522, 1996 WL 72262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearlstein-v-pennsylvania-national-bank-trust-co-fladistctapp-1996.