Youthkins v. Cascio
790 N.E.2d 264, 99 N.Y.2d 638, 760 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 369
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (298 AD2d 386 [2002]).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Graffeo and Read. Taking no part: Judge Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Youthkins v. Cascio, 790 N.E.2d 264, 99 N.Y.2d 638, 760 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 369 (N.Y. 2003).
790 N.E.2d 264 (Youthkins v. Cascio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gray v. State of New York
205 A.D.3d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Manzella v. County of Suffolk
2018 NY Slip Op 5296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Green v. New York City Housing Authority
81 A.D.3d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Exime v. Williams
45 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Ferris v. Millman
17 Misc. 3d 898 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Itzkowitz v. King Kullen Grocery Co.
22 A.D.3d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Figueroa v. Gallager
20 A.D.3d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Paladino v. Time Warner Cable
16 A.D.3d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Weissman v. Weissman
790 N.E.2d 264 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)