Weissman v. Weissman

790 N.E.2d 264, 99 N.Y.2d 638, 760 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 320
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal from the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not a party aggrieved (see CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the QDRO and stipulation, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weissman v. Weissman, 790 N.E.2d 264, 99 N.Y.2d 638, 760 N.Y.S.2d 91, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 320 (N.Y. 2003).

790 N.E.2d 264 (Weissman v. Weissman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sprole v. Sprole
2017 NY Slip Op 8223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)