YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedFebruary 8, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-06968
StatusUnknown

This text of YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED (YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED, (S.D. Ind. 2023).

Opinion

NN NS ee OD A.G. Sharpe, Clerk = © Bye FILED District Court Re District of Indiana 4 6 02/08/2023 □□□ UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL th ho Wa { on U.S. DISTRICT COURT De puty Clerk MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIAN Roger A.G. Sharpe, Clerk

IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC., IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2570

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —236)

On October 15, 2014, the Panel transferred 13 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 53 F.Supp.3d 1379 (JJ.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 958 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard L. Young. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Indiana and assigned to Judge Young. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 15, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard L. Young. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this □□□□□ period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: —— Pile BA Feb 08, 2023 chaten ermres John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC., IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2570 SCHEDULE CTO−236 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION MINNESOTA MN 0 23−00129 Dingman v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:23-cv-6967-RLY-TAB NEVADA 1:23-cv-6968-RLY-TAB NV 2 23−00022 Younker v. Cook Incorporated et al OHIO SOUTHERN 1:23-cv-6969-RLY-TAB OHS 1 22−00744 Sansone, Jr. v. Cook Incorporated et al PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN PAE 2 23−00120 HERBERT v. COOK GROUP, INC. et a1l:23-cv-6970-RLY-TAB TEXAS NORTHERN TXN 3 23−00188 Bedford v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:23-cv-6971-RLY-TAB

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
53 F. Supp. 3d 1379 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
YOUNKER v. COOK INCORPORATED, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/younker-v-cook-incorporated-insd-2023.