Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. v. Sawyer; And Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al.

343 U.S. 937, 72 S. Ct. 775
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 3, 1952·No. Nos. 744, 745·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

Certiorari granted. Mr. Justice Burton, with whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter concurred, voted to deny cer-tiorari, and filed a memorandum expressing their reasons [938] therefor. The cases are assigned for argument on Monday, May 12, next.

The order of the District Court entered April 30, 1952, is hereby stayed pending disposition of these cases by this Court. It is further ordered, as a provision of this stay, that Charles S. Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce (respondent in No. 744 and petitioner in No. 745), take no action to change any term or condition of employment while this stay is in effect unless such change is mutually agreed upon by the steel companies (petitioners in No. 744 and respondents in No. 745) and the bargaining representatives of the employees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. v. Sawyer; And Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al., 343 U.S. 937, 72 S. Ct. 775 (1952).

343 U.S. 937 (Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. v. Sawyer; And Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darden v. Wainwright
477 U.S. 168 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Ohio Ex Rel. Eaton v. Price
360 U.S. 246 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Artukovic v. Boyle
107 F. Supp. 11 (S.D. California, 1952)