Youngbird v. Whirlpool Corp.

649 N.E.2d 832, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1213

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 7, 1995·No. No. 94-612·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Youngbird v. Whirlpool Corp., 649 N.E.2d 832, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1213 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

649 N.E.2d 832 (Youngbird v. Whirlpool Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.