Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

922 A.2d 891, 592 Pa. 40, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1171
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 31, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed with the caveat that the Commonwealth Court shall modify its Order to specify that the calculation and award of benefits should not include any award for lifetime claim benefits as claimant conceded that she was discontinuing her claim for lifetime benefits.

Justice SAYLOR files a concurring statement in which Justice BALDWIN joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 922 A.2d 891, 592 Pa. 40, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1171 (Pa. 2007).

922 A.2d 891 (Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R. Bernauer, Sr. v. Tinicum Twp. (WCAB)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2022
P. DiLaqua v. City of Philadelphia Fire Dept. (WCAB)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021