Young v. Village of Potsdam

269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 A.D. 918 (Young v. Village of Potsdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Village of Potsdam, 269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

The only question presented is identical with that in McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., concur on the authority of McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469); Hill, P. J., concurs on such authority and upon Bernardine v. City of New York (294 N. Y. 361). [See post, p. 1005.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. City of Rochester
284 A.D. 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Sofka v. State
202 Misc. 235 (New York State Court of Claims, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-village-of-potsdam-nyappdiv-1945.