Young v. Village of Potsdam
This text of 269 A.D. 918 (Young v. Village of Potsdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented is identical with that in McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., concur on the authority of McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469); Hill, P. J., concurs on such authority and upon Bernardine v. City of New York (294 N. Y. 361). [See post, p. 1005.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-village-of-potsdam-nyappdiv-1945.