Young v. Village of Potsdam
269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The only question presented is identical with that in McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., concur on the authority of McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469); Hill, P. J., concurs on such authority and upon Bernardine v. City of New York (294 N. Y. 361). [See post, p. 1005.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Village of Potsdam, 269 A.D. 918, 58 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 918 (Young v. Village of Potsdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. City of Rochester
284 A.D. 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Sofka v. State
202 Misc. 235 (New York State Court of Claims, 1952)