Jones v. City of Rochester
This text of 284 A.D. 1029 (Jones v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: - At the time of the assault Boryszewski was acting within the scope of his employment as a police officer of the City of Rochester and under the evidence it was for the jury to determine whether plaintiff’s arrest and detention for alleged intoxication was justifiable and whether police officer Boryszewski while taking plaintiff to the police station inflicted an unjustifiable injury upon plaintiff. (McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs, 269 App. Div. 469; Young v. Village of Potsdam, 269 App. Div. 918, affd. 297 N. Y. 712; De Wald v. Seidenberg, 297 N. Y. 335; Daniels v. City of Syracuse, 200 Misc. 415.) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in an action for assault and false arrest.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 1029, 134 N.Y.S.2d 912, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1954.