Young v. Turner

318 So. 2d 467, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15197
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 25, 1975
DocketNo. U-390
StatusPublished

This text of 318 So. 2d 467 (Young v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Turner, 318 So. 2d 467, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15197 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record, briefs and oral arguments and find no error in the proceedings below. The judgment of the trial court is presumed to be correct and although there are conflicts in the testimony, the trial judge was in a far better position to judge the credibility of the witnesses than is the appellate court. [468]*468The evidence is sufficient to support the findings and conclusions of the trial court and therefore his final judgment and order on defendant’s motion to vacate the final judgment are affirmed. See Cook v. Cook, Fla.App. (1st), 305 So.2d 12, and Belin v. Sanchez, Fla.App., 101 So.2d 64.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Cook
305 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Belin v. Sanchez
101 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 So. 2d 467, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-turner-fladistctapp-1975.