Cook v. Cook

305 So. 2d 12
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1974
DocketU-494
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 305 So. 2d 12 (Cook v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cook v. Cook, 305 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

305 So.2d 12 (1974)

Maria S. COOK, Appellant,
v.
William Arthur COOK, Jr., Appellee.

No. U-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 19, 1974.

Joseph M. Glickstein, Jr. and Thomas C. Dearing, of Glickstein, Crenshaw, Glickstein, Fay & Block, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Joseph S. Farley, Jr., of Mahon, Farley & Vickers, Jacksonville, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of those portions of the final judgment pertaining to custody of the minor child of the parties and the visitation rights of the appellant-mother.

We have heard oral agrument in this cause and have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have given due consideration to the applicable principle *13 that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record before this Court reveals that although there are some conflicts in the testimony, there is sufficient evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this Court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court abused its discretion or otherwise committed reversible error. There has been no such clear showing herein.

Our affirmance of the judgment below in no way precludes the appellant-mother from seeking a modification of said judgment should the circumstances of the parties herein change at a subsequent date.

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C.J., and DREW, E. HARRIS (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horatio Enterprises, Inc. v. Rabin
614 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Banco Do Brasil v. City Nat. Bank
609 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Fagan v. Fagan
381 So. 2d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Looney v. Looney
355 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.
349 So. 2d 1187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Finn v. Schneider-Richter & Associates P. A.
343 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Young v. Turner
318 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 So. 2d 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cook-v-cook-fladistctapp-1974.