Young v. Temporary Release Committee of Albion Correctional Facility

122 A.D.2d 606, 505 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59892
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 122 A.D.2d 606 (Young v. Temporary Release Committee of Albion Correctional Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Temporary Release Committee of Albion Correctional Facility, 122 A.D.2d 606, 505 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner, while an inmate at the Albion Correctional Facility, was terminated from the work-release program for failing to report to her designated furlough residence and failing to observe her assigned curfew. Special Term erred in directing respondents to hold a new temporary release revocation hearing to allow petitioner to call witnesses on her behalf. The record reveals that petitioner failed to request any witnesses at the temporary release revocation hearing, or at the Superintendent’s hearing which preceded it (see, 7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]; cf. 7 NYCRR 1904.2 [b]) and thereby waived her claim (see, Matter of Geddes v Wilmot, 111 AD2d 474, 475; Matter of Guzman v Coughlin, 90 AD2d 666; Matter of Hicks v LeFevre, 59 AD2d 423, 425-426). Accordingly, we need not reach petitioner’s constitutional claims. We note, however, that participation in a temporary release program is a privilege (Correction Law § 855 [9]), and that the scope of judicial review is limited to whether respondents violated any statutory requirement or whether respondents’ determination was affected by irrationality bordering on impropriety; we find neither is the case here (see, Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson, 106 AD2d 386). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Miles, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quartararo v. Catterson
917 F. Supp. 919 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Grant v. Temporary Release Committee
209 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Roucchio v. Coughlin
208 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
McNamara v. Coughlin
162 Misc. 2d 504 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Gomez v. Obot
170 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Wright v. Kelly
148 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.2d 606, 505 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-temporary-release-committee-of-albion-correctional-facility-nyappdiv-1986.