Roucchio v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roucchio v. Coughlin

208 A.D.2d 749, 618 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 749 (Roucchio v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roucchio v. Coughlin, 208 A.D.2d 749, 618 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated October 26, 1991, which removed the petitioner from a work-release program, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), dated April 12, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to establish that the respondent vio[750]*750lated any statutory requirement or denied his constitutional rights in reaching his determination (see, Correction Law § 855 [9]). Nor was that determination affected by irrationality. Thus, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition (see, Matter of Young v Temporary Release Comm., 122 AD2d 606; Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson, 106 AD2d 386).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, CPLR 7804 [g]). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated October 26, 1991, which removed the petitioner from a work-release program, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), dated April 12, 1993, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner failed to establish that the respondent vio[750]*750lated any statutory requirement or denied his constitutional rights in reaching his determination (see, Correction Law § 855 [9]). Nor was that determination affected by irrationality. Thus, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition (see, Matter of Young v Temporary Release Comm., 122 AD2d 606; Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson, 106 AD2d 386).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, CPLR 7804 [g]). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 749, 618 N.Y.S.2d 548, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roucchio-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack