Young v. State
925 S.W.2d 505, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 1996 WL 408728
Opinion
ORDER
Adam Young appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion because [506]*506trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to allow him to testify.
Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 925 S.W.2d 505, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296, 1996 WL 408728 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
925 S.W.2d 505 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.