Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. State

910 S.W.2d 718, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1679, 1995 WL 592732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1995·No. No. WD 50466·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Young plead guilty to one count attempted forcible rape, Section 565.060, RSMo 1986, one count attempted forcible sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo 1986, and assault in the first degree, Section 565.050, RSMo 1986.

Mr. Young appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. He claims trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate, interview, and depose witnesses concerning exculpatory statements allegedly made by the victim.

No precedential purpose in publishing a written opinion existing, the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed by summary order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Young plead guilty to one count attempted forcible rape, Section 565.060, RSMo 1986, one count attempted forcible sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo 1986, and assault in the first degree, Section 565.050, RSMo 1986.

Mr. Young appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. He claims trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate, interview, and depose witnesses concerning exculpatory statements allegedly made by the victim.

No precedential purpose in publishing a written opinion existing, the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed by summary order. Rule 84.16(b).

Young v. State, 910 S.W.2d 718, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1679, 1995 WL 592732 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

910 S.W.2d 718 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.