Young v. State

877 So. 2d 881, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10480, 2004 WL 1570364
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 803 So. 2d 880
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2004·No. No. 4D04-2319·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Janet Marie Young timely challenges the dismissal of her motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm without prejudice to her right to file a legally sufficient motion addressing her claim of entitlement to jail credit. See Trapkin v. State, 830 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Gethers v. State, 798 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), approved, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003).

WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 877 So. 2d 881, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10480, 2004 WL 1570364 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

877 So. 2d 881 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gethers v. State
838 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Trapkin v. State
830 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Gethers v. State
798 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)