Young v. State
116 So. 507, 22 Ala. App. 436, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 118
Opinion
This court en banc has considered the record in this.appeal. We are of the opinion that the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge as to the first count of the indictment, and, further, that the alleged confession of the defendant as to the crime charged in said first count was improperly admitted, there being no evidence to. prove the corpus delicti of the offense therein charged.
Other questions need not be considered.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 116 So. 507, 22 Ala. App. 436, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
116 So. 507 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singleton v. State
35 So. 2d 375 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Sauls v. State
199 So. 254 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)