Young v. State

116 So. 507, 22 Ala. App. 436, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 118
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 1928
Docket7 Div. 385.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 116 So. 507 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. State, 116 So. 507, 22 Ala. App. 436, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 118 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court en banc has considered the record in this.appeal. We are of the opinion that the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge as to the first count of the indictment, and, further, that the alleged confession of the defendant as to the crime charged in said first count was improperly admitted, there being no evidence to. prove the corpus delicti of the offense therein charged.

Other questions need not be considered.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singleton v. State
35 So. 2d 375 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Sauls v. State
199 So. 254 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 507, 22 Ala. App. 436, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-alactapp-1928.