Young v. Punturo

270 Mich. App. 801

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Punturo. Read the opinion of the Court — 270 Mich. App. 553 →

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided April 5, 2006·No. Docket No. 223586·Published

Opinion

This Court held defendant’s motion for reconsideration in abeyance pending final action by the Alabama Supreme Court. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that the Tuscaloosa County Circuit Corut lacks jurisdiction over the custody, child support, and visitation issues concerning the children of the parties. Accordingly, this Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is granted, and this Court’s opinion issued June 25,2002, is hereby vacated. A new opinion will be issued.

Griffin, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Griffin, J., did not participate.

Young v. Punturo, 270 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

270 Mich. App. 801 (Young v. Punturo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.