Home/Michigan Court of Appeals/Young v. PUNTURO

Young v. PUNTURO

721 N.W.2d 870, 271 Mich. App. 801
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 2006
Docket223586
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 721 N.W.2d 870 (Young v. PUNTURO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. PUNTURO, 721 N.W.2d 870, 271 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 870 (2006)
271 Mich. App. 801

Wanda YOUNG
v.
Bryan PUNTURO

Docket No. 223586.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

April 5, 2006.

WILDER, J.

This Court held defendant's motion for reconsideration in abeyance pending final action by the Alabama Supreme Court. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled that the Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court lacks jurisdiction over the custody, child support and visitation issues concerning the children of the parties. Accordingly, this Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED, and this Court's opinion issued June 25, 2002 is hereby VACATED. A new opinion will be issued.

GRIFFIN, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.
160 Wash. 2d 560 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.
160 P.3d 17 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Alton
731 N.W.2d 99 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)
Rusnak v. Walker
729 N.W.2d 542 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 870, 271 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-punturo-michctapp-2006.