Young v. Preston
This text of 8 U.S. 239 (Young v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But notwithstanding these authorities, The Court adhered to their first impression, some of the judges saying, *that the plaintiff had a clear right of action upon the sealed instrument; he might aver in his declaration that he had, in part, performed the work, and was ready to do the rest, but was prevented by the defendant. And whenever a man may have an action on a sealed instrument, he is bound to resort to it.
Judgment reversed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 U.S. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-preston-scotus-1808.