Young v. People

35 Ill. App. 363, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 573
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 12, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Ill. App. 363 (Young v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. People, 35 Ill. App. 363, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 573 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Opinion

Gary, P. J.

One John Murphy was administrator of the estate of Hannah Goodman, and the appellants were sureties on his bond, in the Probate Court. Murphy obtained, in the Probate Court, an order giving him leave to sell the personal estate of the deceased. Under that order he sold to Bridget Mitchell the interest of the deceased in a frame building, for §275, and received the money. That sale the court first approved, but afterward held that the interest of the deceased in the building was not personal property, and ordered Murphy to refund the money to Bridget Mitchell. He did not refund, though she demanded the money, and this suit upon his bond is brought for his default. It is the general law that an administrator takes no estate, title or interest in the real property of the deceased. Le Moyne v. Quimby, 70 Ill. 399, and cases there cited. And the Probate Court can authorize him to sell it only by pursuing the statute in such case made and provided. There was, in this case, no attempt to sell in that mode. It follows that by mistake, which Murphy, or the court, or both made, he had in his hands money which did not belong to him as administrator, and which he had no authority, as administrator, to receive or retain. For this money he is liable individually. It is not a charge upon the estate of Hannah Goodman.

Humerous cases are collected in a note in 1 Coms. Ex., 599, which hold that the sureties are not liable in such a case. See also Douglass v. Mayor, 56 How. Pr. R. 178. The judgment against the appellants is erroneous, and must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. Old Republic Surety Co.
561 N.E.2d 1208 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1990)
People ex rel. First National Bank v. Illinois National Insurance
358 N.E.2d 99 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
People v. Parker
132 P. 56 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)
McPike v. McPike
20 S.W. 12 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. App. 363, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-people-illappct-1890.