Young v. Holder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 697 F.3d 976
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2011·No. 07-70949·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH CRISTOPHER YOUNG, aka  Joseph Christopher Young, No. 07-70949 Petitioner,

v.  Agency No.

A035-029-889

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed July 29, 2011

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

10131

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Holder, (9th Cir. 2011).

Young v. Holder (Young v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Terrence Breckenridge
424 F. App'x 664 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Reina-Rodriguez v. United States
655 F.3d 1182 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Jose Campos-Moreno v. Eric Holder, Jr.
444 F. App'x 120 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Ricardo Dominguez Gutierrez
446 F. App'x 151 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Reina-Rodriguez v. United States
655 F.3d 1182 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)