Young v. Holder

653 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15665, 2011 WL 3250632
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 697 F.3d 976
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2011·No. 07-70949·Published

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. Holder, 653 F.3d 897, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15665, 2011 WL 3250632 (9th Cir. 2011).

653 F.3d 897 (Young v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Holder
653 F.3d 897 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)