Young v. Corder
This text of 2 Miles 155 (Young v. Corder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit in Bland v. Drake, 18 E. C. L. Ü. 58, bears a very close resemblance to the present affidavit. The alleged defect there and here may be regarded as precisely similar. We think that decision was correct, and accordingly direct this rule to be discharged.
Rule discharged.
Vide Comly v. Goldsmith; McCanles v. Frederickson; Benedict v. Whartenby and Kelly v. Kintzing, in this volume, and the index.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miles 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-corder-pactcomplphilad-1837.