Young v. Carter

173 S.E.2d 259, 121 Ga. App. 191, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1168
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 28, 1970
Docket44885
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 173 S.E.2d 259 (Young v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Carter, 173 S.E.2d 259, 121 Ga. App. 191, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1168 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from an order overruling his motion for new trial in a personal injury suit. The trial court directed a verdict on the issue of liability and the jury returned a verdict of $10,000. He contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion for mistrial based upon the following statement made by the plaintiff’s attorney in his opening remarks to the jury: “. . . we will show that the defendant at that time made a statement to the [192]*192lady, and insisted that she go to the doctor, that he stated that to her, that it was his fault — that his insurance company would take care of it for her. . .”

Argued November 5,1969 Decided January 28, 1970 Rehearing denied February 16, 1970 Bouhan, Williams & Levy, Frank W. Seiler, for appellant. Austin, Pahno •& Herndon, Donald E. Austin, for appellee.

“Admissions against interest are such even though they may contain a suggestion that the party making them carries insurance, and the mere fact, that insurance, or an insurance company, is mentioned as an inextricable part of the statement made by such party or conversation in which he indulged, does not make the evidence inadmissible when offered by the opposite party.” Wade v. Drinkard, 76 Ga. App. 159 (5a) (45 SE2d 231); Hix v. Headrick, 97 Ga. App. 540 (103 SE2d 516). If the statement is admissible in evidence as an integral part of an admission, it necessarily follows that an attorney has the right to say in his opening statement that he expects to prove this admission.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall, P. J., Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Crump
476 S.E.2d 817 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Dubose v. Ross
473 S.E.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Gonzalez v. Wells
445 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Carter v. Madray
195 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Butts v. Davis
190 S.E.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
McDuffie County v. Rogers
184 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Young v. Carter
173 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 S.E.2d 259, 121 Ga. App. 191, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-carter-gactapp-1970.