Young v. Carter
This text of 173 S.E.2d 259 (Young v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Defendant appeals from an order overruling his motion for new trial in a personal injury suit. The trial court directed a verdict on the issue of liability and the jury returned a verdict of $10,000. He contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion for mistrial based upon the following statement made by the plaintiff’s attorney in his opening remarks to the jury: “. . . we will show that the defendant at that time made a statement to the [192]*192lady, and insisted that she go to the doctor, that he stated that to her, that it was his fault — that his insurance company would take care of it for her. . .”
“Admissions against interest are such even though they may contain a suggestion that the party making them carries insurance, and the mere fact, that insurance, or an insurance company, is mentioned as an inextricable part of the statement made by such party or conversation in which he indulged, does not make the evidence inadmissible when offered by the opposite party.” Wade v. Drinkard, 76 Ga. App. 159 (5a) (45 SE2d 231); Hix v. Headrick, 97 Ga. App. 540 (103 SE2d 516). If the statement is admissible in evidence as an integral part of an admission, it necessarily follows that an attorney has the right to say in his opening statement that he expects to prove this admission.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 S.E.2d 259, 121 Ga. App. 191, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-carter-gactapp-1970.