Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

983 A.2d 303
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedDecember 15, 2009
Docket30940
StatusPublished

This text of 983 A.2d 303 (Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, 983 A.2d 303 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

983 A.2d 303 (2009)
118 Conn.App. 904

Barry YOUNG
v.
ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, et al.

No. 30940.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued November 19, 2009.
Decided December 15, 2009.

HARPER, ROBINSON and LAVERY, Js.

PER CURIAM.

Practice Book § 22-4 provides a mechanism for the correction of a board's factual findings. The plaintiff's failure to file a timely motion to correct prevented the trial court from reviewing facts found by the board, and it is bound by them. See JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422, 828 A.2d 609 (2003).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
828 A.2d 609 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
983 A.2d 303 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 A.2d 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-administrator-unemployment-compensation-connappct-2009.