Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

983 A.2d 303
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 15, 2009·No. 30940·Published

Opinion

983 A.2d 303 (2009)
118 Conn.App. 904

Barry YOUNG
v.
ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, et al.

No. 30940.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued November 19, 2009.
Decided December 15, 2009.

HARPER, ROBINSON and LAVERY, Js.

PER CURIAM.

Practice Book § 22-4 provides a mechanism for the correction of a board's factual findings. The plaintiff's failure to file a timely motion to correct prevented the trial court from reviewing facts found by the board, and it is bound by them. See JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422, 828 A.2d 609 (2003).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, 983 A.2d 303 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).

983 A.2d 303 (Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
828 A.2d 609 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
983 A.2d 303 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)