Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

983 A.2d 303, 118 Conn. App. 904, 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 528
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedDecember 15, 2009
DocketAC 30940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 983 A.2d 303 (Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 983 A.2d 303, 118 Conn. App. 904, 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 528 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Practice Book § 22-4 provides a mechanism for the correction of a board’s factual findings. The plaintiffs failure to file a timely motion to correct prevented the trial court from reviewing facts found by the board, and it is bound by them. See JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422, 828 A.2d 609 (2003).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
983 A.2d 303 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 A.2d 303, 118 Conn. App. 904, 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-administrator-unemployment-compensation-act-connappct-2009.