Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
983 A.2d 303, 118 Conn. App. 904, 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 528
Opinion
Practice Book § 22-4 provides a mechanism for the correction of a board’s factual findings. The plaintiffs failure to file a timely motion to correct prevented the trial court from reviewing facts found by the board, and it is bound by them. See JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 265 Conn. 413, 422, 828 A.2d 609 (2003).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 983 A.2d 303, 118 Conn. App. 904, 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 528 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
983 A.2d 303 (Young v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
983 A.2d 303 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)